فارسی
1. ابوذری، مهرنوش (2025). مقابله با بزهکاری در عصر هوش مصنوعی: پیشبینی به مثابه پیشگیری. دوفصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی, 1(2) doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.720961
2. الهی منش؛ مرادی. (2025). حق بر مجازات نشدن؛ رویکردی نوین در کاربست پاسخ های کیفری. دوفصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.2049454.1138.
3. شیرزاد پرگو، ایمان؛ آقابابایی، حسین (1403 ش)، سیاست جنایی تقنینی و قضایی ایران پیرامون نهادهای ارفاقی در جرائم غیرخشونت آمیز علیه امنیت دولت، آموزه های حقوق کیفری، 21(27)، 7- 34
4. رستمی، هادی، (1402 ش)، نهادهای ارفاقی در سیاست جنایی ایران با تاکید بر گسترش افراطی و ناکارآمدی، فصلنامه آموزههای حقوق کیفری 20 (25)، 153-178
5. جوانجعفری بجنوردی، عبدالرضا ؛ فرهادی، آلاشتی زهرا ، تأملی بر خوانش فیلسوفان اصالت فایده از بازدارندگی کیفر مرگ فصلنامه مجلس و راهبرد، 26(100)، 215- 241.
6. موسوی مجاب, سیّد درید. (2024). اراده و تأثیر آن بر مسئولیت جنایی؛ با رویکرد به نظام حقوقی کشورهای اسلامی. آموزههای حقوق کیفری کشورهای اسلامی, 1(1), 64-82.
انگلیسی
1- Bagaric, Mirko, Svilar, Jennifer, Bull, Melissa, Hunter, Dan, & Stobbs, Nigel. (2022). The solution to the pervasive bias and discrimination in the criminal justice system: transparent and fair artificial intelligence. American Criminal Law Review, 59(1), 95-148.
2- Belyakova, Anna Vladimirovna. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: issues and outlooks. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 5(3), 68-87.
3- Bhattacharya, Istapada, & Karmakar, Mrinmay. (2023). An Analysis of the Legal and Ethical Consequences of the Usage of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Investigations. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 6, 2085-2091.
4- Caianiello, Michele. (2021). Dangerous liaisons. potentialities and risks deriving from the interaction between artificial intelligence and preventive justice. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 29(1)
5- Chronowski, Nora, Kalman, Kinga, & Szentgali-Toth, Boldizsar. (2021). Artificial intelligence, justice, and certain aspects of right to fair trial. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Legal Studies, 10(2), 169-189.
6- De Diego Carreras, Alberto. (2020). The moral (un)intelligence problem of artificial intelligence in criminal justice: comparative analysis under different theories of punishment. UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, 25(1), i-38.
7- Đurđević, Z., & Ivičević Karas, E. (2023). Uporaba umjetne inteligencije u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku: postojeće stanje i perspektiv. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 30(2), 227-242.
8- Dolidze, Tatia. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Reality and Perspective. Law and World, 31, 80-97., 1-24.
9- Garrett, B. L., & Rudin, Cynthia. (2024). The right to glass box: rethinking the use of artificial intelligence in criminal justice. Cornell Law Review,109(3) , 561-628.
10- Hunter, Dan, Bagaric, Mirko, & Stobbs, Nigel. (2020). framework for the efficient and ethical use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system. Florida State University Law Review, 47(4), 749-800.
11- Josey, Alanah. (2019). Jeremy bentham and canadian evidence law: the utilitarian perspective on mistrial applications. Manitoba Law Journal, 42(4), 291-314. P 295
12- Kaplina, O., Tumanyants, A., Krytska, I., & Verkhoglyad-Gerasymenko, O. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence systems in criminal procedure: Key areas, basic legal principles and problems of correlation with fundamental human rights. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2023(3), 147–166.
13- Kuklin, Bailey. (2018). Public requitals: corrective, retributive, and distributive justice. Cleveland State Law Review, 66(2), 245-340. P 271
14- Lowe, B. N. (2017). Punishment without purpose: the retributive and utilitarian failures of the child pornography non-production sentencing guidelines. Cleveland State Law Review, 65(2), 231-258.p 240
15- Murray, B. M. (2021). Retributive expungement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169(3), 665-716.p679.
16- Nita, Gabriel. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence tools in the criminal justice system. Revista Romana de Drept al Afacerilor, 2023(2), 69-84.
17- O'Hanlon, Stephen. (2009). Towards more reasonable approach to free will in criminal law. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, 7(2), 395-428. P425.
18- Strauss, A. R. (2002). Losing sight of the utilitarian forest for the retributivist trees: an analysis of the role of public opinion in utilitarian model of punishment. Cardozo Law Review, 23(4), 1549-1596.
19- Spiridonov, M. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies in criminal procedural proving. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(2), 481-497
20- Tang, Yanan. (2024). The predicaments and countermeasures of the application of artificial intelligence in criminal justice. Foundation for Law and International Affairs Review, 5(1), 119-140.
21- Abouzari, M. (2025). Dealing with Crime in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Prediction as Prevention. (e720961). Research and development in criminal law and criminology, 1(2), e720961.(In persian)
22- Bagaric, Mirko, Svilar, Jennifer, Bull, Melissa, Hunter, Dan, & Stobbs, Nigel. (2022). The solution to the pervasive bias and discrimination in the criminal justice system: transparent and fair artificial intelligence. American Criminal Law Review, 59(1), 95-148.
23- Belyakova, Anna Vladimirovna. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: issues and outlooks. Legal Issues in the Digital Age, 5(3), 68-87.
24- Bhattacharya, Istapada, & Karmakar, Mrinmay. (2023). An Analysis of the Legal and Ethical Consequences of the Usage of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Investigations. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 6, 2085-2091.
25- Caianiello, Michele. (2021). Dangerous liaisons. potentialities and risks deriving from the interaction between artificial intelligence and preventive justice. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 29(1), 1-24.
26- Chronowski, Nora, Kalman, Kinga, & Szentgali-Toth, Boldizsar. (2021). Artificial intelligence, justice, and certain aspects of right to fair trial. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Legal Studies, 10(2), 169-189.
27- De Diego Carreras, Alberto. (2020). The moral (un)intelligence problem of artificial intelligence in criminal justice: comparative analysis under different theories of punishment. UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, 25(1), i-38.
28- Đurđević, Z., & Ivičević Karas, E. (2023). Uporaba umjetne inteligencije u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku: postojeće stanje i perspektiv. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 30(2), 227-242.
29- Dolidze, Tatia. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Reality and Perspective. Law and World, 31, 80-97.
30- Elahimanesh, M. R. and Moradi, M. (2025). THE RIGHT NOT TO BE PUNISHED: A New Approach to the Application of Criminal Sanctions. Research and development in criminal law and criminology, 2(3), 58-104.(In persian)
31- Garrett, B. L., & Rudin, Cynthia. (2024). The right to glass box: rethinking the use of artificial intelligence in criminal justice. Cornell Law Review,109(3) , 561-628.
32- Hunter, Dan, Bagaric, Mirko, & Stobbs, Nigel. (2020). framework for the efficient and ethical use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system. Florida State University Law Review, 47(4), 749-800.
33- JAVAN JAFARI BOJNORDI, ABDOLREZA, & FARHADI ALASHTI, ZAHRA. (2020). A Survey of Utilitarian Philosophers’ Reading on Capital Punishment Deterrence. MAJLIS & RAHBORD, 26(100 ), 215-241. (In persian)
34- Josey, Alanah. (2019). Jeremy bentham and canadian evidence law: the utilitarian perspective on mistrial applications. Manitoba Law Journal, 42(4), 291-314. P 295
35- Kaplina, O., Tumanyants, A., Krytska, I., & Verkhoglyad-Gerasymenko, O. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence systems in criminal procedure: Key areas, basic legal principles and problems of correlation with fundamental human rights. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2023(3), 147–166.
36- Kuklin, Bailey. (2018). Public requitals: corrective, retributive, and distributive justice. Cleveland State Law Review, 66(2), 245-340. P 271
37- Lowe, B. N. (2017). Punishment without purpose: the retributive and utilitarian failures of the child pornography non-production sentencing guidelines. Cleveland State Law Review, 65(2), 231-258.p 240
38- Murray, B. M. (2021). Retributive expungement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169(3), 665-716.p679.
39- Mousavi Mojab, S. D. (2024). The Will and Its’ Impact on Criminal Liability; with an Approach to the Legal System of Islamic Countries. Criminal Law Doctrines of Islamic Countries, 1(1), 64-82.(In persian)
40- Nita, Gabriel. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence tools in the criminal justice system. Revista Romana de Drept al Afacerilor, 2023(2), 69-84.
41- O'Hanlon, Stephen. (2009). Towards more reasonable approach to free will in criminal law. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, 7(2), 395-428. P425.
42- Rostami, H. (2024). Evaluation of Lenient Institutions in Iran’s Criminal Policy (By Emphasis on Extreme Expansion and Inefficient). Criminal Law Doctrines, 20(25), 153-178.(In persian)
43- Shirzad pargoo, I. and Aghababaei, H. (2024). The Legislative and Judicial Criminal Policy of Iran Regarding Clemency Mechanisms in Non-Violent Crimes against State Security. Criminal Law Doctrines, 21(27), 7-34.(In persian)
44- Strauss, A. R. (2002). Losing sight of the utilitarian forest for the retributivist trees: an analysis of the role of public opinion in utilitarian model of punishment. Cardozo Law Review, 23(4), 1549-1596.
45- Spiridonov, M. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence technologies in criminal procedural proving. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(2), 481-497
46- Tang, Yanan. (2024). The predicaments and countermeasures of the application of artificial intelligence in criminal justice. Foundation for Law and International Affairs Review, 5(1), 119-140.
