Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Differentiated Criminal Procedure in the-Trial Stage of Terrorism Cases: A Review of the Legal System of the United States, the United Kingdom and Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hasan Ali moazenzadegan 1
Ehsan shakib nezhad 2
Mohsen kHORRAMDELL 3
1 Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology Department, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran
2 MA in International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student in Criminal Law and Criminology Department, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran
10.22034/jclc.2025.2068077.1230
Abstract
The manner of prosecuting this violent crime during the preliminary investigation phase has been a subject of attention, concomitant with the increasing reach of terrorism and the necessity for effective countermeasures against this ominous phenomenon. Therefore, the drafting and establishment of special regulations aimed at preventing the occurrence or escalation of terrorist attacks in the pre-trial stage plays a vital and significant role in enhancing the state’s protective function toward society.

Differentiated proceedings in the realm of terrorism are justified from two perspectives—the offender and the victim—by considering the high-risk personality of terrorist perpetrators and the complexity of detecting imminent terrorist acts, as well as the need to formulate protective aspects and compensation for victims.

Following the September 11 attacks and the July 2005 bombings, the legal systems of the United States and the United Kingdom adopted regulations based on a differentiated approach. These include mechanisms such as preventive detention, surveillance of communications, the use of special agents to monitor potential activities, and the restriction of the right to access a lawyer. The findings indicate that these two countries, with a security-driven approach, have distanced themselves from the tenets of modern social defense and tend towards a return to the classical school of criminal justice.

In contrast, despite the ratification of scattered regulations such as the Law on Combating the Financing of Terrorism, the Iranian legal system lacks a comprehensive and coherent framework for differentiated proceedings in terrorist crimes.

This paper seeks to answer the question of what differentiated mechanisms the legal systems of the United States and the United Kingdom utilize in the preliminary investigation of terrorist crimes, and how Iran’s laws can be reviewed and supplemented in line with national interests. This research, utilizing library resources and employing a descriptive-analytical methodology, attempts to answer this question and strives to provide solutions for addressing the existing deficiencies and gaps in the Iranian legal system through a comparative study.
Keywords
Terrorism
Differentiated Procedure
Pre-Trial
System of the United States
the United Kingdom
Iran

Subjects

  • A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKHL 56, 2004, available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldjudgmt/jd041216/a&oth-1.htm.
  • Abdollahi, M (2009). Terrorism: human rights & Humanitarian Law. first edition. Tehran: The SD Institute of Law Research & study. (In Persian)
  • Akbari Babukai, E (2017). Jurisprudential and legal examination of government intrusion into privacy. Journal of Islamic Human Rights Studies. (In Persian)
  • Amnesty International, Guantanamo Detainess (2003). human rights Are Not Negotiable, 26 Nov, available at: https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/amr511412003en.
  • Anderson, David (2012). Control Orders In 2011; Final Report Of Independent Reviewer On The Prevention Of Terrorism Act 2005. London: The Stationery Office, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c8b62e5274a0bb7cb7be7/9780108511417.
  • Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act, 2001, available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/24/contents.
  •  Armando Piccinni (2017). Psychopathology of terrorists. Cambridge University, available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cns-spectrums/article/abs/psychopathology-of   terrorists/369CCC0509564BFDF46532A5BF9393CC.
  • Aviation Security Improvement Act, 1990, available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/house-bill/5732.
  • Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, General Assembly resolution 60/147, 15 December 2005.
  • Becker, M. H., Decker, S. H., LaFree, G., et al  (2022). A comparative study of initial involvement in gangs and political extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344827350_A_Comparative_Study_of_Initial_Involvement_in_Gangs_and_Political_Extremism.
  • Brittnee Carter (2020). Bringing suspected terrorists to justice? Revealing bias against Muslims in applied counter terrorism by the U.S, Contemporary Justice Review available:  https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1719363.
  • Byman, D (2015). Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Global Jihadist Movement. NewYork: Oxford University Press. available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/al-qaeda-the-islamic-state-and-the-global-jihadist-movement-9780190217266?cc=ir&lang=en&.
  • Christian A. Honeywood (2016). Britain’s Approach to Balancing Counter-Terrorism Laws with Human Rights, Journal of Strategic Security, Number 3 Volume 9, No. 3.
  • CICA, Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, available at: https://cica-criminal-injury-uk.com/.
  • Cohen b, David (2004). American national security and civil liberties in an era of terrorism, Pal grave, Macmillan, 1st pub.
  • Crelinsten, R .D (2014). Perspectives on counterterrorism: From stovepipes to a comprehensive approach. Perspectives on Counterterrorism, 8(1), 4.
  • Declaration of Basic principles of Justice for victims of Crime and Abuse of power, 29 November 1985, available at: https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/dbpjvcap/dbpjvcap.html.
  • Dolliver, Matthew J., and Erin M. Kearns (2022). "Is it terrorism?: Public perceptions, media, and labeling the Las Vegas shooting." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 45. Issue 1.
  • Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Title 28, Chapter V, part 501.3, available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-501.
  • European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes, Council of Europe, 1983, available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680079751.
  • Federal Wiretap Act of 1968 (Title III) and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act/ Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA)/ The Patriot Act’s Effect on Existing Wiretap Laws. Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. The United Kingdom, 12244/86
  • Frindiches, D, (1995). Trusted criminal ''White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society''1995, Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  • Golder, Ben and Williams, Georges (2004). “What is Terrorism? Problems of Legal Definitions”, UNSW Law Journal, Vol.2, available at:  https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/UNSWLJ/2004/22.html.
  • Guideline on Human Rights and the Fight against Terrorism, available at: https://book.coe.int/en/terrorism-and-law/3208-human-rights-and-the-fight-against-terrorism-the-council-of-europe-guidelines.html.
  • Hafez, M (2006). Rationality, culture, and structure in the making of suicide bombers: a preliminary theoretical synthesis and illustrative case study. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, DOI:10.1080/10576100500496964.
  • Hamm, M (1998). Terrorism, hate crime, and antigovernment violence: a review of the research. In H. W. Kushner (ed.). The Future of Terrorism: Violence in the New Millennium. SAGE Publications.
  • Hobbes, T (2019). Leviathan. Fourteenth edition. Tehran: nashreney. (In Persian)
  • Immigration and Nationality Act, )1965( available at: https://www.lbjlibrary.org/news-and-press/media-kits/immigration-and-nationality-act.
  • Jean Marc Sorel (2003). Some Questions About the Definition of Terrorism and the Fight Against Its Financing. European Journal of International Law, Volume 14, Issue 2, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.2.365
  • Jorge Luis Bronstein and others Case (1997). (Argentina), 11. 205, Ni2/97 Annual Report or the I.A.COM.H.R.
  • Makarenko, T (2004). The crime-terror continuum: Tracing the interplay between transnational organised crime and terrorism, Published online: 08 Sep 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/1744057042000297025.
  • Manzoor Elahi Laskar (2013). Summary of Social Contract Theory by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau SSRN Electronic Journal, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2410525.
  • Matthew, J. & Erin M. Kearns (2019), Is It Terrorism?:  Public Perceptions, Media, and Labeling the Las Vegas Shooting, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Published online: 08 Aug,available:https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1107&context=criminaljusticefacpub.
  • Merari, A (2007). Psychological Aspects of Suicide Terrorism, in Bonger, Bruce, Brown, Lisa, M, Beutler, Larry, E, Breckenridge, James, N, Zimbardo, Philip, G, (eds), New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nabiollah, G & Moazami, SH (2018). Security-based Criminology and its Strategies in Process of Criminal Procedure; with an Emphasis on Criminal Law in Iran, France and The United States. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 5, Issue 10. (In Persian)
  • Najafi Abrandabadi, Ali Hossein & Soodabeh Rezvani. (2015). Preventive Detention with Emphasis on Article150 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran 1392, Journal of Criminal Law Research Volume 4, Issue 12 - Serial Number 12, October 2015, Pages 9-42. https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2015.1780 .(In Persian)
  • Namamian, P (2024). Understanding Substantive and Procedural Developments in Combating Terrorist Crimes in International Criminal Law, Journal of Research and Development in Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 1, Issue 1, doi 10.22034/jclc.2024.718659. (In Persian)
  • National Defense Authorization Act 2011, available at: https://www.dpc.senate.gov/dpcdoc.cfm?doc_name=lb-111-2-146.
  • Neumann, Franz Leopold (2011), The democratic and the authoritarian state. Kharazmi. (In Persian)
  • Parker, E (1996). Constitutional Law - United States v. Goldberg: The Third Circuit's Nontraditional Approach to Waiver of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel”, Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository, available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229121997.pdf.
  • Parker, T (2005). Appendix A: Counterterrorism Policies in the United kingdom. In protecting Liberty in an Age of Terror. ed. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press, 123.
  • Jordan, P (2003). Judicial Power to Determine the Status and Rights of Persons Detained without Trial. Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 44, No.2.
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act ,1984, available at:  https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/contents.
  • President Bush, State of the Union Address 20 January 2004, http://georgewbush-whitehouse. archives.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040120-7.html.
  • Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1974. available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/56/enacted.
  • Rayejian Asli, M (2019). An Introduction and overview criminology. Third edition. Tehran: samt publications. (In Persian)
  • Richard L, R (2015). A Comparative Analysis of the USA P e Analysis of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 t T Act of 2001 to the USA FREEDOM ACT of 2015: Balancing Security with Liberty. University of Central Florida.
  • Sadeghi, S & Samadirad, B & Eslami, T (2024). A Comparative Study of Mechanisms of Combating Bioterrorism against Children (With a Comparative Study in International Conventions, USA, Canada, Australia and Germany), Research and development in comparative law (In Persian). doi: 10.22034/law.2025.2046784.1575
  • Brzuszkiewicz, S (2023). Terrorism: The present, the future and the unpredictability of the threat. First published online October 21. Available at: //https://journals.sagepub.com.
  • Zarneshan, SH (2007). Security Council and Measures for States to Combat against Terrorism. International Law Review, Volume 24. Issue 36. January 2007. Pages 57-94. doi: 10.22066/cilamag.2007.17787 (In Persian)
  • UK Criminal Justice Act, 1972, available at: https://vlex.co.uk/vid/criminal-justice-act-1972-808185573.
  • UK Terrorism Act, 2000, Part VI, available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/section/58.
  • United Nations Security Council Resolution 1566, S/RES/1566 (2004). 8 October 2004, available at: https://sanctionsplatform.ohchr.org/record/14587?ln=en.
  • United States v. Bin Laden (1999). United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 58 F. Supp. 2d 113.
  • Victims of Terrorism Compensation Act, 1986. available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/victims_of_terrorism_compensation_act.
  • Walter, Christian (2003). Defining Terrorism in National and International Law. Berlin, Heidelberg. available at: https://uniset.ca/terrorism3/1-2-Defining-Terrorism-in-National-and-International-Law- Christian-Walter.
  • Zedner, L (2018). The concept of security: an agenda for comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press:  02 January.
Research and development in criminal law and criminology
Volume 2, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
March 2026
Pages 450-493