Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Prevention of Privacy Violations in Electronic Litigation Processes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, Roshdiyeh Institute of Higher Education, Tabriz, Iran.
2 MA in Criminal Law and Criminology, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz.
3 PhD Student of Criminal Law and Criminology, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Electronic litigation, as an innovative process, has significantly reduced many challenges in the judicial procedure and plays a key role in achieving the primary objective of criminal law: ensuring justice and legal accountability in the shortest possible time. This type of litigation, by minimizing temporal and spatial constraints, reducing judicial system costs, increasing the speed of case handling, improving information management, and enhancing judicial and administrative security, has brought substantial benefits to the legal system.

Despite these advantages, one of the major challenges of electronic litigation is the violation of individuals’ privacy. Digital technologies, by providing extensive tools for data collection and processing, create new threats to the security of personal and professional information and underscore the urgent need for privacy protection. The present study, while examining the manifestations of privacy violations in the electronic litigation system, analyzes preventive measures against these threats across three key stages of litigation: investigation, trial, and enforcement, aiming to propose a comprehensive framework to enhance the efficiency and security of electronic litigation.

Research Method: This study employs a descriptive-analytical approach to examine various aspects of privacy protection in electronic litigation. It identifies situational, social, and legislative preventive measures and analyzes mechanisms to improve performance and strengthen public trust in the judicial system.

Findings and Results: The findings indicate that privacy in the digital space holds the same legal and ethical significance as privacy in the physical world, and safeguarding personal and professional documents and information is essential. Regarding situational prevention, electronic monitoring and judicial oversight using advanced tools are among the most effective strategies. Social prevention includes enhancing digital literacy, promoting transparency, increasing public trust, and encouraging citizen participation in oversight. From a legislative perspective, enacting an independent and effective law to protect privacy is of critical importance.

Establishing a secure and transparent electronic litigation system requires coordinated collaboration between judicial authorities and civil society, and preventive measures across the legislative, situational, and social domains must be implemented simultaneously to mitigate privacy threats and maintain public trust in the electronic judicial system.
Keywords

Subjects


  • Abdollahpour, E. (2015). Master’s thesis: Electronic monitoring and its executive consequences in the Iranian legal system (Advisor: A. Salarifar). Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch.
  • Abouzari, M. (2025). Dealing with Crime in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Prediction as Prevention. Research and development in criminal law and criminology, 1(2). doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.720961
  • Ashouri, M., & Mirzaei, A. (2012). Criminal law and economic–industrial development: Lessons from modern criminal law doctrines. New Era Criminal Law Teachings, 4, Autumn & Winter.
  • Back, S., & LaPrade, J. (2020). Cyber-situational crime prevention and the breadth of cybercrimes among higher education institutions. International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime, 3(2), 25-47.
  • Barth S, De Jong MDT.) 2017) The Privacy Paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior. Telematics and Informatics;34 (7):1038–1050.
  • Eshghpour, M. A. N. (2016). The place of electronic procedure in Iranian law. Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 2(13), Autumn.
  • Farhadi Alashti, Z. (2016). Situational prevention of cybercrimes. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.
  • Heydarnejad, K., & Taghizadeh, A. (2022). Criminology and preventive measures in Iranian criminal law. 2nd National Conference on Law, Jurisprudence and Culture, Shiraz.
  • Javidzadeh, H. R., Mireh, S. H., & Peyvandi, Gh. (2004). Electronic surveillance and its review in the light of Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Law Review, 1(2), 193-220.
  • Moazzanzadegan, H., & Rousta, N. (2017). Electronic proceedings confronting cybercrimes: Challenges and necessities. Judiciary Law Review, 81(100), 169-195
  • Newman, G., & Clarke, R. V. (2016). Rational choice and situational crime prevention: Theoretical foundations. Routledge.
  • O'Hara K, Shadbolt N. (2019) Trust, Transparency, and the Role of Technology in Governance. The Journal of Technology in Society ;12(1):43–57
  • Piza, E. L., Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P., & Thomas, A. L. (2019). CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: A 40‐year systematic review with meta‐analysis. Criminology & public policy, 18(1), 135-159.
  • Pour, S. R. (1999). Electronic monitoring of defendants and offenders. Journal of Correction and Rehabilitation, 79, 40-45.
  • Pourbafrani, H. , heydarpour, H. and Ghasemi, H. (2025). An Introduction to the Principles of Crime Prevention Policymaking and Sssessment of the Situation of Those Recognition in Iranian Legal System.). Research and development in criminal law and criminology, doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.2052560.1159
  • Rahmati, H. (2023). Master’s thesis: Violation of privacy in electronic criminal procedure with emphasis on manifestations and solutions (Advisor: J. Beigi). Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch.
  • Reisi Dezaki, L., & Ghasemzadeh Liasi, F. (2020). Challenges of Iranian legal system in violation of personal data and privacy in cyberspace. Judiciary Law Review, 84(110), 123-146.
  • Rosenbaum, D., Luricio, A., & Davis, R. (2000). Situational crime prevention. Judiciary Law Review, 3(32), 147-172.
  • Solove DJ, Schwartz PM (2020). Information Privacy Law. 6th ed. Aspen Publishers.
  • Tadayyon, A. (2009). Respect for individuals’ privacy in the collection of evidence in criminal procedure of Iran and France, and in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Comparative Law Journal, 16, 83-104.
  • Voigt P, Von dem Bussche A. (2017) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide. Springer.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 25 September 2025