Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Examining the Aggravation of Punishment for Fraud Committed by Government Employees and Affiliated Institutions

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Former Supreme Court Judge and PhD in Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The Iranian criminal justice system, through the enactment of the Law on Aggravated Punishment for Perpetrators of Bribery, Embezzlement, and Fraud (1988), has imposed harsher penalties for fraud compared to previous legislation to enhance its effectiveness in combating such offenses. Additionally, it prescribes more severe imprisonment sentences for individuals employed by the government or affiliated institutions, classifying this as a form of "aggravated fraud" within Iranian criminal law. A key legal debate surrounding this offense concerns whether the mere existence of an employment relationship with the government suffices to justify the aggravation of punishment, or whether the offender must have exploited their official position to commit the crime. Legal scholars and practitioners, analyzing judicial practice and legal doctrine, have arrived at differing conclusions—some affirming, others rejecting this requirement—often relying on intuitive interpretations rather than legislative intent. This study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, examining provisions of the Islamic Penal Code (Ta'zirat) that, in various contexts, enhance criminal penalties. By focusing solely on the legislative framework rather than subjective interpretations, this research aims to determine the Iranian legislature’s criteria for sentencing enhancement and provide a definitive answer to the above question. A careful examination of legislative methodology reveals that Iranian law consistently establishes a direct correlation between sentence enhancement and the impact of specific circumstances or conduct on the commission of the crime or its consequences. Based on this legislative pattern, the study concludes that if a government employee commits fraud without abusing their official position, the aggravation of punishment lacks justification under Iran’s legislative criminal policy.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Laws

    1. Law on Intensification of Punishment for Perpetrators of Bribery, Embezzlement, and Fraud (1988). (in Persian)

    2. Ta'zirat Law (1983). (in Persian)

    3. Law on the Criminal Court for Government Employees (1955). (in Persian)

    4. Islamic Penal Code (Book Five: Ta'zirat and Deterrent Punishments) (1996). (in Persian)

    5. Islamic Penal Code (2013). (in Persian)

    6. General Penal Code (1925). (in Persian)

    7. Law on the Collection of Certain Government Revenues and Their Allocation in Specific Cases (1994). (in Persian)

    Books

    1. Imani, Abbas. (2007). Dictionary of Criminal Law Terms. Tehran: Nameh Hasti Publications, 2nd ed. (in Persian)

    2. Bushehri, Seyyed Jafar. (2008). Criminal Law, Vol. 4 (Judicial Decisions and Case Law). Tehran: Sherkat-e Sahami-ye Entechar, 4th ed. (in Persian)

    3. Pourbafrani, Hassan. (2011). Specific Criminal Law (Crimes against Public Security and Order). Tehran: Jangal Publications, 1st ed. (in Persian)

    4. Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar. (1995). Legal Terminology. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publications, 7th ed. (in Persian)

    5. Razavi-Fard, Behzad. (2011). International Criminal Law. Tehran: Mizan Publishing, 1st ed. (in Persian)

    6. Onsori Fard, Abbas. (2005). Offending Public Decency in Iranian Law. Tehran: Aryan Publications, 2nd ed. (in Persian)

    7. Mohaqqeqi, Reza. (2015). Criminal Titles: Explanation of Common Crimes in Iranian Law. Tehran: Elm-o Danesh Publications, 1st ed. (in Persian)

    8. Validi, Mohammad Saleh. (2009). Fundamentals of General Criminal Law (Volumes I, II, and III). Tehran: Jangal Publications, 1st ed. (in Persian)