Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Research and development in criminal law and criminology

Analyzing the Criminalization of Drug Addiction within the Framework of Status-Based Offenses: A Comparative Study of Iranian and U.S. Criminal Law

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Candidate, Department of Jurisprudence and the Foundations of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and the Foundations of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
Abstract
A significant issue in criminal law is the criminalization of conditions not grounded in the commission of a specific actus reus (criminal act), but rather based on the recognition of a specific state or circumstance of an individual. Drug addiction is a prominent example of such a condition, consistently serving as a subject of controversy among criminal law scholars. This study, utilizing a descriptive-analytical methodology, examines the criminalization of addiction within the framework of “status-based offenses.” Through a comparative study of the legal systems of Iran and the United States, it analyzes the similarities and differences in how these systems address this phenomenon. First, the theoretical foundations of addiction and status-based offenses, along with their constitutive elements, are elucidated. Subsequently, the perspectives on the criminalization of addiction within Iranian and American law are analyzed. By examining the U.S. criminal approach toward the status of addiction and the critical distinction between “use” and “addiction,” this study provides a framework for analyzing and comparing the respective criminal policies. The findings reveal that the criminalization of addiction conflicts with fundamental principles of criminal law, including the principle of legality (nullum crimen sine lege) and the principle of act-based criminalization. In the U.S. legal system, relying on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Robinson v. California, the status of “mere addiction” has been deemed non-punishable, a position supported by the majority of legal theorists. In Iranian law, although addiction has been criminalized since 1980, the legislative approach has gradually shifted from a punitive model to a treatment-oriented one. From a theoretical perspective, the alignment of “mere status” with the material element of a crime (actus reus) remains unjustifiable. Accordingly, a reconsideration of Iran’s criminal policy toward this phenomenon is warranted.
Keywords
Subjects

Aghababai, Hossein, and Behnaz Rezaei Zafar. (2014). “The Criminalization of Drug Addiction in Light of the Principle of Legal Paternalism.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21. (in Persian)
Ardebili, Mohammad Ali. (2014). General Criminal Law, vol. 2. Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
Bakke, W. M. (2020). Against the status crimes doctrine. SMU Law Review Forum, 73(1), 232–243.   https://scholar.smu.edu/smulrforum/vol73/iss1/20
Bennett, L. (2018). Punishing poverty: Robinson & the criminal cash bond system. Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 24(2), 315–342.
Cornwell, J. K. (2023). Status-based prosecution: Conflict, confusion and the quest for coherence. Journal of Constitutional Law.
Elahimanesh, Mohammadreza, and Mohsen Moradi Oujqaz. (2025). “The Right Not to Be Punished: A New Approach in the Application of Penal Responses.” Research and Development in Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 58–104. 10.22034/jclc.2025.2049454.1138 (in Persian)
Esmaeili, Seyyed Ali. (2002). Dependence and the Consequences of Drug Addiction. Sari: Department of Culture and Islamic Guidance. (in Persian)
Kendall, D. (2017). Sociology in our times (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Keynia, Mehdi. (1994). Social Factors of Divorce. Qom: Qods Printing. (in Persian)
Khanjari, Mahrouyeh. (2015). A Legal Analysis of the Crime of Addiction in Light of the 2010 Amendment to the Anti-Narcotics Law. Master’s Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Shahroud. (in Persian)
Lai, A. (2015). Confronting proxy criminalization. Denver Law Review, 92(4), 879–912.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
Linton, R. (1936). The study of man: An introduction. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lloyd, C. (2010). Sinning and the sinned against: The stigmatisation of problem drug users. UK Drug Policy Commission. https://www.ukdpc.org.uk/publication/sinning-and-the-sinned-against/
Mohammad nasl, Gholamreza. (2014). Fundamentals of Crime Prevention. Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
Najafi Abrandabadi, Ali-Hossein, and Hamid Hashembeigi. (2011). Encyclopedia of Criminology, 2nd ed. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh. (in Persian)
Nourbaha, Reza. (2008). Foundations of General Criminal Law, 10th ed. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh. (in Persian)
Ocen, P. A. (2017). Birthing injustice: Pregnancy as a status offense. George Washington Law Review, 85(5/6), 1166–1225.
Prins, H. (1982). Criminal behavior: An introduction to criminology and the penal system (2nd ed.). Tavistock Publications.
Rahmdel, Mohammad. (2003). “Addiction and Drug Abuse in Iran: Decriminalization or Criminalization?” Social Welfare Quarterly, no. 9, pp. 203–242. (in Persian)
Rahmdel, Mohammad. (2006). “Human Rights and Drug Addicts.” Journal of Correction and Rehabilitation, nos. 58–59. (in Persian)
Saket, Mohammad Hossein. (2025). “A New Look at an Old Punishment: Taʿzir.” Research and Development in Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 262–276. 10.22034/jclc.2025.720962 (in Persian)
Saki, Mohammadreza. (2001). Drug-Related Crimes from the Perspective of Domestic and International Law. Tehran: Khatt-e Sevvom Publishing. (in Persian)
Schoepflin, T. (2010, May 27). Ascribed status vs. achieved status: The case of homelessness. Everyday Sociology Blog. https://www.everydaysociologyblog.com/2010/05/ascribed-status-vs-achieved-status-the-case-of-homelessness.html
Soltani, Mehdi. (2014). General Criminal Law, vol. 1. Tehran: Dadgostar Publishing. (in Persian)
U.S. Code. (n.d.). 34 U.S.C. § 11103 – Definitions. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/34/11103
White, Rob, and Fiona Haines. (2006). Crime and Criminology. Translated by Ali Salimi. Qom: Seminary and University Research Institute. (in Persian)
Zeraat, Abbas. (2007). General Criminal Law, vol. 1. Tehran: Qoqnoos Publications. (in Persian)
 
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.